Advertisement
Torn Pages From a Life
A Conversation with Full Frontal Scribe Coleman Hough
|
| Coleman Hough |
Recalling posters from what was arguably Hollywood's last Golden Age-the 1970s-the poster for Steven Soderbergh's new, indie-vibed film, Full Frontal, bears only three key personnel besides its cast: the director, writer and producers. If you don't recognize writer Coleman Hough's name from her equal billing with powerhouse Soderbergh, it's because this is her first produced screenplay. Her stage plays Angel and Mr. Charm, At Night and Alphabet Soup were produced by Theatre of NOTE in Los Angeles, and her poetry has appeared in Southern Poetry Review, The Louisville Review and The Asheville Review. Currently living in New York, here Coleman talks with MM about her screenwriting debut, working with Steven Soderbergh and how the "real world" informs her writing.
Steven Peros (MM): This is your first produced screenplay and it came about through your friendship with director Steven Soderbergh. Can you tell us a little about that friendship and how it eventually grew into the development of Full Frontal?
Coleman Hough (CH): Yes, Full Fontal is my first produced screenplay, but in 1996 Steven hired me to write a modern adaptation of Julius Caesar and he was going to produce it. I set it in the new age and called it The Infidels. [It is] all about a spiritual leader named Julia C. who runs a camp called Camp Co-Create; she is killed while murdering a cow and her murder is covered up by her co-creators. The timing was never right for that one and I think people who read it thought I must have been insane. Anyway, Steven and I loved working together, so we tried to find another project. Two summers ago, I wrote a short play called Shipping and Receiving that he was interested in putting on film-and that short play eventually became Full Frontal, the movie.
MM: The script was sent to prospective cast members with a rather unique set of rules, three of which relate to script. Rule 7: Improvisation will be encouraged. Rule 8: You will be interviewed about your character. This material may end up in the finished film. Rule 9: You will be interviewed about the other characters. This material may end up in the finished film. At what point was it decided that improvisation would become a part of the process?
CH: Improvisation is always part of the process. I don't think Steven is alone in encouraging actors to improvise. Writers improvise; directors improvise. Why should actors be left out of the fun? Basically, it was code to the actors for "relax and breathe."
MM: How did you feel about that?
CH: I was happy to watch how this gave them the freedom to experiment and come back to the script with renewed energy. When Steven interviewed the actors in character, talking about their character or another character, it was thrilling to hear how generous they were with their responses-as if they'd planted the character so deeply inside themselves; you could hear the bloom.
MM: In what way were you involved in deciding what would or would not make it into the film?
CH: Steven asked me to write a list of questions he would ask the actors. But beyond that, I had no say. I wanted no say; I was curious to see what it would become. Once I had written the script, Steven, the crew and the actors took over. It took on a life of its own. Some things were left out, some things were added. Some things multiplied, some things deepened. The final cut stayed true to the script but, of course, in the process it became greater than the sum of all its parts.
MM: Some actors are better or worse with improvisation. Were any steps taken to ensure you were assembling a cast that knew how to improvise?
CH: No, just a cast that responded to the script.
MM: Given the evolutionary nature of the script, it would seem like Soderbergh would have wanted you on set. Was that the case?
CH: Yes, I was on set. But my security pass said "guest." Steven graciously invited me to be on the set, but I didn't do any rewrites or have any tantrums. I listened on the headset and watched it all unfold. Steven always encourages an atmosphere of collaboration. It was a relaxed set: great food and a high energy that allowed for play. That was the whole point of making Full Frontal. Since I had already done my work, I was relieved to be off duty.
MM: Were you involved in the editing process?
CH: No. I saw a cut before they locked picture, though. Again, I didn't want to be involved in doing Steven's job. He did not sit in the room with me at 2 a.m. while I rocked back and forth and conjured the dream that would become Full Frontal.
MM: You've written a number of plays that have been performed in New York and Los Angeles. What similarities do your plays share with Full Frontal?
CH: My characters all share an operatic scale of suffering that is muted by having to survive the day to day. Everyone speaks in code: enduring silences, searching for words that won't explode and make a mess of things. I love to create uncomfortable situations. I often live them. Full Frontal started with a crazy conversation I had with a friend about a birthday present I had given her on her fortieth birthday. She had been offended by it and waited a year to tell me. After our evening together, I wrote down our conversation word for word so I could understand it. My plays and Full Frontal all share torn pages from my own life.
MM: Like Short Cuts and Timecode, Full Frontal is, among other things, a commentary about contemporary life in Los Angeles. You're presently a New Yorker. How much time have you spent in Los Angeles?
CH: The week I moved to LA the Gulf War began. and more news followed. Earthquakes, fires, floods, riots, OJ. I lived in LA from 1991 to 1995. I worked as a temp at Disney by day and wrote for two theater companies at night and all other non-Disney hours. Living on the fringe of the movie industry was like being a spy. Those four years were packed with drama and absurdities.
MM: So the big question: Which do you prefer? New York or LA?
CH: I prefer living in New York. I prefer driving in LA.
MM: In the opening paragraph of the production notes, this film is called "a movie about movies for people who love movies." Do you agree?
CH: I think it's catchy. There's a certain ring of truth to it.
MM: Do you have a drawer full of unproduced screenplays or does this represent a playwright's first stab at writing for film?
CH: I am dusting off The Infidels and a few others that I mailed to myself as proof that I had written them.
MM: Tell us a little about your writing process. Are you a morning or night writer? Computer or typewriter? Coffee or tea?
CH: I like coffee-iced-strong, or steamy latte without foam. I write in notebooks at night. I make lists. I am a compulsive list-maker. Every now and then something from my list interests me. I took a fiction workshop in LA that changed my writing life. I am serious about the list making. Taking inventory-laying out some choices so when something dead ends, there is more on a page you can turn to. I studied with a writer named Irene Borger; she gave me the most powerful tool to open that door in my head that often gets stuck. I am grateful to her for showing me how to fill my notebooks with all that I need. She also gave me a practice to which I am devoted which consists of 30 minutes at a time. No editing, just 30 minutes of hand action-be it typing or printing or scrawling. It feels a bit like diving into cold water, but once submerged there is pleasure and relief from gravity.
I do not have a certain time of day that I write. I feel as if I am always writing-stashing away notes in my head about something or another, some conversation overheard or one that I've had.
When I write it has usually taken me a few hours to circle into it: I make coffee, refill my water bottle, check my email, update my address book, hang up my clothes from the day before, rearrange the furniture. And then I do the 30 minutes at a time thing. When I am starting something, this is the best way. To behave as if I'm drunk-crashing through windows, falling off ledges.
MM: What are you working on now?
CH: I am writing The Katharine Graham story for HBO. Nerve.com is promoting Full Frontal with a relationship-themed column I will write for a few weeks. I have been commissioned to write a short play for The Victory Project, which is a post 9/11 project to be produced at Columbia University in the fall, and I will direct a short film that I wrote called A Tale of Two in September.
SHARE THIS STORY |
TAGS |
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
This story was sponsored by
Latest from the blog:
Jaman Launches “Movie Channel for the World”
Jaman.com announced the availability of instantly streamed, HD-quality movies—for free.
With nothing more than a simple click, cineastes can watch one of 100 ad-supported titles from the online distributor's collection of more than 3,000 films at no cost. Alternatively, those viewers who are less inclined to "pay" for the free films by watching the ads can pay just $1.99 to watch them commercial-dree. “By offering a free streaming media service along with our current rental and ownership download options, we are anticipating the future of digital cinema," says Jaman founder and CEO, Gaurav Dhillon. "With streaming, we provide our community with a quality viewing experience that is free and for our advertisers, we deliver a unique audience and premium and targeted placement opportunities.”
Posted 05.15.08 | News/Commentary | 1 comment
Other recent posts:
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
