Advertisement
Nancy Oliver Gets Real
Michael Yada / ©A.M.P.A.S.
The story of a man and his blow-up doll isn’t the first logline that comes to mind when thinking “Oscar nominee,” but that’s been the real-life experience of screenwriter Nancy Oliver. “It’s been a total trip and surprise and my mind is blown that it all happened,” admits Oliver of her script for Lars and the Real Girl, which scored a nomination for Best Original Screenplay earlier this year. Though it’s her debut as a feature film scribe, Oliver is no stranger to the writing game. In 2005, she became a co-producer and writer on HBO’s “Six Feet Under,” a show created by her longtime friend Alan Ball. Today, Oliver’s busy collaborating with Ball once again, this time on the new HBO series, “True Blood,” and is in the early stages of another film project.
On the occasion of Lars and the Real Girl‘s DVD release, MM caught up with Oliver to discuss her writing process and how “a strange job where I was in touch with a lot of lonely guys and weird Websites” started it all.
Jennifer Wood (MM): How did the idea for the script come about in the first place?
Nancy Oliver (NO): A script is born of many different things, and the actual man-doll connection… I had a strange job where I was in touch with a lot of lonely guys and a lot of weird Websites and found the real doll one, and those faces stayed with me… It really stuck with me, the meaning of what it would be like to need a plastic doll.
MM: Did anyone ever seem surprised that the film was written by a woman? For some reason, the idea of a guy and his sex doll just seems like an inherently male idea.
NO: I think they were surprised before they saw the movie.
MM: Exactly. Because once you read the script or see the movie, I think you get a different take on it.
NO: Then they think it’s going to be some kind of guy-flick kind of thing.
MM: I know that your original script did deal with Lars’ sexuality a little bit, but that it didn’t make it into the final film because of the director and Ryan Gosling’s interpretation. Are you precious about your material or have you learned to sort of let a script go—that at some point it’s not your material anymore?
NO: I think my criteria is, ‘If it works, it’s fine.’ I love to cut—I love to cut my own stuff. As a matter of fact, they pretty much had to hold me back from cutting even more, because I’m like, ‘That doesn’t work… that doesn’t work.’ So I’m not precious in that way. I mean, there are certain elements that naturally I was like, ‘Aw, I wish I could have seen how that played out,’ but often it may not have played out so well.
The sexual element that I was talking about, it’s still a very subtle thing in the movie and wouldn’t have been like a screaming, changing difference. So no, I don’t think I am precious about it in that way. I’ll try to protect what I feel needs to be protected for the good of the movie, but I also realize that other people are often right and I’m lucky to be working with such quality people. So I listen, too.
MM: So you were pretty involved. Were you on the set a lot?
NO: I was. They didn’t particularly want me there and I can totally understand that, but I promised to keep my mouth shut. I never went to film school, so I needed to see it get made. It’s different than television, and so it was a tough experience, but it was a really good experience for me.
MM: So do you have any plans to direct yourself or would you like to stay on the writing side of things?
NO: Well I’m gonna give it a shot. I’ve directed in theater all the way along; I directed before I started writing, actually, or writing seriously. And I think I will get a shot at directing a television episode for the show that I’m working on now, “True Blood.” And we’ll see if I have it or if I don’t. It should be pretty clear by the end whether it’s a fit.
MM: You wrote the script for Lars before you started working on “Six Feet Under.” How did your work on the show help in getting Lars and the Real Girl made? Do you think that that was part of it? I mean, the show really seems to have almost reminded Hollywood that challenging material could be entertaining, in a way, looking at Alan Ball’s work as well. So do you think having that did help you?
NO: I think it gave me a little more cred, you know. The people who really liked the show would be more willing to read the script in spite of the bad pitch line.
MM: What was the pitch line?
NO: Well I didn’t pitch it, but “a guy falls in love with a sex doll, hijinks ensue.” I couldn’t ever bring myself to pitch it, so I just wrote the script and just handed it out. You know, “Six Feet Under” was my first real job, so I was really lucky that it was on a show that good and I think it did help in terms of getting people to read it.
1 of 2 |
SHARE THIS STORY |
TAGS |
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
Latest from the blog:
Jaman Launches “Movie Channel for the World”
Jaman.com announced the availability of instantly streamed, HD-quality movies—for free.
With nothing more than a simple click, cineastes can watch one of 100 ad-supported titles from the online distributor's collection of more than 3,000 films at no cost. Alternatively, those viewers who are less inclined to "pay" for the free films by watching the ads can pay just $1.99 to watch them commercial-dree. “By offering a free streaming media service along with our current rental and ownership download options, we are anticipating the future of digital cinema," says Jaman founder and CEO, Gaurav Dhillon. "With streaming, we provide our community with a quality viewing experience that is free and for our advertisers, we deliver a unique audience and premium and targeted placement opportunities.”
Posted 05.15.08 | News/Commentary | 1 comment
Other recent posts:
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
Advertisement
