MovieMaker The Art and Business of Making Movies » Login | Register  

September 5, 2008

ABOUT | CONTACT | NEWSLETTER | Search

festivals

Email
Print

World Cinema In New York City

An Interview With Richard Peña

Richard Pena
Richard Pena (center) at the 2000 NYFF. Photo by Stephanie Berger.

Dear to New Yorkers for its long-standing tradition of provoking audiences with spellbinding films from top-notch, international auteurs, over its 38-year history the New York Film Festival has been responsible for introducing the likes of Godard, Bertolucci, Fassbinder, and Scorsese to American audiences. "If you look at the history of the NYFF since 1963," says chairman of the festival's selection committee, Richard Peña, "you'll find that it was a great engine around the appreciation of French New Wave and Czech New Wave in the 1960s, or New German Cinema in the 1970s."

Mr. Peña's 1988 appointment to the post of Program Director of the Film Society of Lincoln Center marked the festival's cinematic expansion well beyond European borders to include, most notably, Latin American and Asian cinemas. In the process, Peña was able to usher in such world-class talent as Zhang Yimou, Chen Kaige, Pedro Almodovar, and Abbas Kiarostami. The 2000 New York Festival was no different when it came to representing some of the best in world cinema. When he's not helping to launch the careers of international moviemakers, Peña hosts the monthly Conversations in World Cinema, which airs on the Sundance Channel. In a conversation with MovieMaker, Peña talks about working at one of the world's most famed festivals and world trends in filmmaking.

MovieMaker: A lot of the films in the program of this year's New York Film Festival were previously screened at Cannes, Locarno, and Venice. What guided your selection?

Richard Peña: The selections are made by myself and by my four colleagues on the selection committee (which this year included Kathleen Murphy, critic Dave Kehr, Newsday Chief Critic John Anderson and L.A. Weekly Film Editor Manohla Dargis). It's a process somewhat arbitrary. There are no assumptions or requirements, or hopefully no agendas, that any of us are trying to push.

MM: One can't help but notice that there were hardly any American independent films in the program this year. Is there any particular reason as to why the lack of showing?

RP: The selection depends on what's out there any given year, and what appeals to us. Last year we didn't have any Chinese films, this year we have four. Last year it was an especially strong year with American independent film and we were proud to include those films.

MM: In your opinion, do you think there is a reason why there were very few American independents out there to choose from?

RP: It is very hard to make any general statements. Everyone is feeling that something big is about to happen around digital [technology]. No one knows quite what that is, but they all feel that somehow digital is going to change things.

MM: And when, if at all, this digital explosion occurs, how will the New York Film Festival react to that? Will you begin screening digital films immediately?

RP: Then it becomes a technical issue, something we are extremely aware of, and are doing our best to address. Right now we can't give filmmakers the option of projecting their work digitally, but maybe we will have to include it in a few years.

MM: On the other side of the technological equation, there are all these Asian films, that are visually ravishing, yet often set as period pieces. What are your thoughts on this tendency toward tradition, as opposed to the modernity that technology is introducing in American film?

RP: When you're dealing with filmmakers from Asian countries, including Iran, you're dealing with filmmakers from civilizations that are four or five thousand years old, so they have lot of history to draw on, lots of tradition and culture. It seems natural to me that those filmmakers have drawn on those images, stories and themes in their work. But these films are very modern. They are films for the year 2000, and not at all a throwback to some earlier kind of filmmaking.

MM: According to Ang Lee, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was made with the thought of becoming a blockbuster in China. Many of the producers of the foreign films that screened at the NYFF are anticipating quick release dates. Will most of this product be able to reach mainstream audiences?

RP: In the late '80s and early '90s, we reached a low point in terms of foreign film availability and appreciation in the U.S. I'm seeing a much greater interest in international cinema than 10 years ago. These films richly deserve and could have, wide audiences. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, especially, is a film that could have a very wide audience. Whether or not that happens depends on a number of variables that are difficult to control: marketing strategies and a lot of different things outside of the purview of film, per se. Certainly there's an audience that is eager for something different, new and extremely well made. I don't think Hollywood has necessarily any interest in promoting foreign films. What happens, though, now that these companies are such enormous, global corporate conglomerates, is that it becomes a more natural for them to get involved in international cinema. Maybe they have an interest in a cable company in Sweden, so suddenly that gives them an interest in this kind of product.

MM: The NYFF has always been dedicated to the art of making films, rather than to their commercial side. Is this a mission you intend to continue?

RP: It's always been the mission of the NYFF to celebrate and promote the art of film, understood as broadly, stylistically and geographically as possible. The role of the festival has always been to be on top of world trends and really provide a platform for introducing this work into the United States. We are not blind to the fact that films have to exist in the marketplace, and we might play a role in helping them expand this marketplace.


SHARE THIS STORY

Del.icio.us this itemDel.icio.us

Reddit this itemReddit

Yahoo this item Yahoo

TAGS

COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT

POST A COMMENT

OUR PRIVACY POLICY | We will not publish or sell or share your email address or other personal information. Read more.

Name:  
Email:  
URL:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

Blog/Forum/Poll navigation

Blog Forums Polls

Latest from the blog:

“Give ‘Till It Hurts” at the Fourth Annual SAW Blood Drive

SAW fans may get to save a life or two with the Fourth Annual SAW “Give ‘Till It Hurts” blood drive. Benefiting the Red Cross, the blood drive is set to coincide with the Halloween premiere of SAW V, the latest entry in the gruesome Lionsgate Films horror franchise, opening nationwide on October 26.

Posted 09.3.08 | Happenings | News/Commentary | No comments yet...

Other recent posts:

Posts people are talking about:

Blog

SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS