Advertisement
Shakespeare on Film: Antony and Cleopatra
In MM's sixth week of Shakespeare on film, we examine why Charlton Heston's Antony and Cleopatra didn't fare too well.
Antony and Cleopatra (1972)
d. Charlton Heston
After playing Marc Antony in the 1950 and 1970 Julius Caesars, Charlton Heston had become obsessed with adapting Antony and Cleopatra, which he considered Shakespeare’s finest work, but which had never previously been filmed at feature length. His love affair with character and play reached a rocky conclusion in this overlong epic.
After writing a screenplay that removes several of Antony’s and Octavius’s friends and officers at negligible cost, he assumed directing duties only after being turned down by Orson Welles, who would surely no have allowed Shakespeare’s inherently cinematic plot to crisscross between Alexandria, Rome, Syria and Athens as sluggishly as Heston; nor, one suspects, would Welles have introduced so much spurious background action, such as the gory bout between two gladiators, which distracts from what should be a riveting meeting between Antony and Octavius, from Act II, Scene ii.
For the battle of Actium, a naval clash Shakespeare could only allude to via “noise of a sea-fight,” Heston craved massive spectacle; he could only afford original footage of Antony’s flagship ramming one of Octavius’s galleys, embellished with outtakes from Ben-Hur (1959). The resulting close-ups of two vast, sturdy replicas, intercut with long shots of tiny, flimsy models are laughable, ruining the pivotal moment when Cleopatra betrays Antony. The later battle, at which Octavius’s cavalry overwhelms Antony’s infantry, is more effective, though Heston cannot resist over-indulging his own heroic image as Antony hacks his way through Roman horsemen with super-human strength.
Lousy reviews scuppered the movie’s chances of wide distribution in America, and, in his autobiography, Heston lamented that “the film I cared more about than any I’ve ever made was a failure.”
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
- Comment by Jamie Welton on 7/12/08 at 11:40 am
More of a question than a comment. Are there legal issues with regards to copywrite when basing a movie on a play/book that was written 100+ years ago?
Latest from the blog:
IFC Center Screens a Restored Version of Day of Wrath
Looking for a way to celebrate Labor Day? Why not attend a screening of Carl Theodor Dreyer’s Day of Wrath (1943) at IFC Center? In an effort to honor the film’s 65th anniversary a brand-new restoration (each frame of the original negative was cleaned and digitally scanned to create a new 35mm print), the film will be playing at New York City's IFC Center from August 29th to September 4th. Called “one of the most completely moving films ever made” by film critic Pauline Kael, seeing Day of Wrath is not only a chance to view the work of a true auteur but also an opportunity to view something that is a part of history, since it was filmed in Nazi-occupied Denmark right before Dreyer fled.
Posted 08.28.08 | News/Commentary | No comments yet...
Other recent posts:
Nothing Is Private for Towelhead
Notes From Movieland: The Green Goddess
Tropic Thunder Storms Box Office for Second Week
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
Advertisement
