Advertisement
The Movies are Shrinking
Hollywood filmmakers lower their sites for a generation raised on television
Here I am, in the heart of the Las Vegas Strip, where Hollywood has spent the last week throwing one of its biggest annual bashes, the NATO/ ShoWest convention. (This particular NATO stands for National Association of Theatre Owners, not North Atlantic Treaty Organization.) Here, in the heart of a city built as a monument to mindless consumerism, exhibitors from across the country are wined and dined over the course of a week while the studios preview their upcoming releases. Among the celebs on hand for the show are Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Kevin Costner, Harrison Ford, Mel Gibson, Jodie Foster, Tom Hanks, Demi Moore, Eddie Murphy, Warren Beatty, Michael Douglas, Michelle Pfeiffer, Robin Williams and Billy Crystal. To find a more impressive assemblage of movie giants you'd have to turn up on Oscar night.
But like most curmudgeons- and let's face it, all critics are curmudgeons at heart- I find it necessary to look beyond the surface glamour and find something dark beating underneath. Not that I have to look very hard. After all, this is a show aimed at exhibitors, and exhibitors, while very often movie buffs, are first and foremost businessmen. Knowing this, the studios lead with what they expect to be their biggest boxofce bonanzas, and that makes the trends we can expect in the next year pretty clear. To paraphrase a famous a famous rock critic: I've seen the future of motion pictures, and its name is TV. Back in the fifties, when television was first coming into existence, the fear in the motion picture industry was that the new medium would make movie theatres unnecessary. Why, the logic went, would anyone venture out into the world to be entertained by issues/05/images projected onto a big screen when the same effect was available on a small box in the comfort of your own home? But the movies didn't die, and the answer to the logical question seemed to be quality. Movies continued to get the services of the best writers, actors and directors, who preferred the larger and more expressive canvas of the big screen to the accessibility of the small box.
Now, with the imminent birth of the information superhighway, movies are again unter threat from TV, though no one seems to think the results will be fatal. But these days, television is threatening to make movies irrelevant in a far more insiduous way. Up until recently, the entertainment food chain dictated that television devoured cinema's leftovers; now it seems to be the other way around. Where movies used to draw their subject matter from books and theatre, the new generation of industry powers-that-be, who grew up on television, are now looking to TV for source material.
 |
So, aside from Steven Spielberg's inevitable announcement of Jurassic Park 2, the biggest news-makers at NATO/ShoWest were announcements of the new Star Trek film, which will team the original crew of the Star Trek Enterprise with the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation; and Mission Impossible, starring--ugh-Tom Cruise. Meanwhile, Universal Studios spent an entire luncheon hyping their big summer release, The Flintstones, which seems to be built entirely around the idea of recreating cartoon effects in a live action film. Compared to that, Warner Bros.' Maverick, which stars Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster, begins to look like an art film. Just imagine what we have to look forward to: Beverly Hills 90210: The Movie.
The state of the Hollywood mainstream has gotten to the point where the most promising films previewed at NATO/ShoWest including Wyatt Earp, starring Kevin Costner; and Love Affair with Warren Beatty, Annette Bening and Katherine Hepburn- are remakes of other movies. (The Earp story's been told several times; Love Affair is a remake of the 1939 film of the same name, which was previously remade with Cary Grant in 1957 as An Affair to Remember and recently immortalized in Sleepless in Seattle. At least in those cases, the source material is interesting.
The truth is, the idea of recycling TV shows as movies, like the idea of sequelizing hits, is the artistic equivalent of incest, and the result- judging from recent examples like The Addams Family, Wayne's World and The Coneheads- is an art form that is in danger of being inbred into idoiocy. Rather than opening the medium up to new ideas, the TV-into-movies formula closes it down. Audiences begin to expect the unexpected, and the unexpected, in the form of truly ambitious films such as Robert Altman's Short Cuts and Peter Weir's Fearless, tend to slip through the cracks. Let's face it: for every surprise art-house hit like Jane Campion's The Piano, there are ten adventurous commercial failures like her previous two films, Sweetie and An Angel at My Table.
Still, the success of The Piano does teach us- and
hopefully exhibitors, too- that there is a market for intelligent
entertainment that doesn't attempt to reduce the form to its most
basic elements. While NATO/ShoWest wasn't a showcase for those types
of films, there are several in the pipeline that look promising.
Among them: Alan Rudolph's (The Moderns) Mrs. Parker, which
will star Jennifer Jason Leigh as famed author and satirist Dorothy
Parker; Quentin Tarantino's (Reservoir Dogs) film noir omnibus
Pulp Fiction; and Robert Altman's (The Player) all-star look
at the Paris fashion industry, Pret-a-Porter. When these
and other films that promise some originality turn up at your local
theatre, see them; it's not just a pleasure, it's a responsibility.
In addition to enriching your own mind, you'll be reminding Hollywood
(and our next generation of moviemakers) that there's an audience
for movies that seek to expand, rather than reduce, the scope of
the medium. MM
SHARE THIS STORY |
TAGS |
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
This story was published in the April 1994 MovieMaker Magazine. The headline was:
The Movies are Shrinking / Hollywood filmmakers lower their sites for a generation raised on television
Order this issue | Subscribe to MM
Latest from the blog:
In Theaters Now: Body of Lies, City of Ember, Quarantine, Happy-Go-Lucky & RocknRolla
Russell Crowe and Ridley Scott take Leonardo DiCaprio along for the ride on their gravy train while Bill Murray and Guy Ritchie aim for comebacks after Garfield and Swept Away, respectively.
Posted 10.10.08 | In Theaters Now | No comments yet...
Other recent posts:
indieProducer’s 6th Annual Screenwriting Competition & Short Film Contest
Penélope Cruz To Receive Tribute at Gotham Awards
Create Your Own SAW V Trailer and Win Big
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
