MovieMaker The Art and Business of Making Movies ยป Login | Register  

July 6, 2008

ABOUT | CONTACT | NEWSLETTER | Search

cinematography

Email
Print

Cinematography Serves the Story

DP Wally Pfister's Laurel Canyon inspired by great films of early '70s

Wally Pfister

Wally Pfister (Credit: Paramount Pictures/Claudette Barius)

Film school may teach you the basics of good filmmaking, but nothing beats an education in the trenches. Long before he attended AFI, cinematographer Wally Pfister was busy making movies-first as a child with a penchant for Super8, and later working in television news and documentaries. After toiling away for more than a decade and under the tutelage of Roger Corman, Pfister is now the one calling the shots. After his triumphant turn behind the camera on Memento, Pfister reunited with director Christopher Nolan in 2002 to shoot the critically acclaimed Insomnia. This spring will bring the release of Lisa Cholodenko's Laurel Canyon, an homage to the "New Hollywood" films of the '70s starring Frances McDormand, Christian Bale and Kate Beckinsale, as well as Peter Collinson's The Italian Job, Pfister's first big-budget action movie.

Jennifer Wood (MM): In what ways did your television news training better prepare you for feature films?

Wally Pfister (WP): I worked in television news from about 1982 to 1986. It was a great discipline for what was to come in feature films, but I'm not so sure I knew it at the time. I shot and edited my own stories, working with reporters and field producers. The experience in the cutting room gave me invaluable experience that I would later draw on in determining the best way to cover a scene in a dramatic feature and what would or would not cut together. I also learned to work quickly in lighting, camerawork and general decision-making in the field. News camerawork was also about 80 percent handheld, so I became quite adept at the handheld camera (both Memento and Insomnia have a great deal of handheld work in them).

MM: Do you think it also helped prepare you for the "digital revolution," in terms of being better versed in video production?

WP: Having shot video for over 20 years, all the hype about the "digital revolution" is kind of overblown to me-a hype that I think is driven by the companies that stand to profit greatly by pushing this technology. The so-called "revolution" basically involves shooting video-nothing more, nothing less. The technology is great for some things, and not developed far enough for others.

MM: You have also worked extensively in documentaries. What is the one thing that you think is most important for any DP to know/learn, regardless of the medium or genre that s/he is working in?

WP: Working in documentaries gives you a great sense of story, of real-life drama. I'm very sensitive to the dialogue and the credibility of the characters when I read a dramatic script. If there is a story point that doesn't make sense, or dialogue I don't believe, the writer loses me. I think this sensitivity comes partly from the years I spent working on documentaries-in real-life situations with real people. Those years also helped forge a lighting style that I am most comfortable with, that is a more natural approach that does not take on a life of its own, but serves the narrative in a more subtle way.

The most important thing a DP needs to learn is how to best serve the story. The technical ability-the nuances of the lighting-all will come with experience. It all begins with breaking down the story and, in collaboration with the director, determining the best way to tell it with the camera.

MM: We often hear about the many moviemakers who got their start working with Roger Corman, which is where you began. People talk about the lessons they learned from him about acting, writing and directing. What did Corman teach you about cinematography, and the film industry as a whole?

WP: I spent most of 1989 working at Roger Corman's studio in Venice, California. We were all well aware of the previous successful "graduates" of Roger's film factory. Ron Howard, Jonathan Demme, James Cameron, and Martin Scorsese had all done films there, so we all knew that there was an opportunity to learn, experiment and move on. Our years there were clearly marked by the budding talent among the cinematographers. Between 1988 and 1990 a group of us all worked together on films. The group included Janusz Kaminski (Catch Me if You Can), Phedon Papamichael (Moonlight Mile), Mauro Fiore (Training Day) and Chris Faloona (Spider-Man). We all helped each other learn the craft and develop our own styles.

The first lesson we all learned at Concorde was how to shoot fast: the films were all shot in 15 to 18 days, and there was no going over schedule. We learned all the basics of photography in an environment where it was difficult to fail. This was the place to experiment and figure it all out, even though most of us were preoccupied with just trying to shoot the eight pages a day!

The thing that amuses me most when I think back is Roger's quirk about dolly track. While he promoted the use of camera movement on his films, he was convinced that it took too long to lay down dolly track for the camera, so we had to sneak it onto rental. Every film used the dolly track, but if Roger came to visit the set, as he did two or three times during each production, the warnings would come from across the stage, and the grips knew to quickly take apart the track and hide it behind a set piece or a wall. Following his visits, the track would be reassembled and we would continue shooting.

MM: Though we tend to think of the film industry as a very competitive field, it is very much rooted in successful collaboration. Who are some of the people you must collaborate with most closely?

WP: The director, of course, is the single most important collaborator for a DP. He or she, in conjunction with the script itself, should be our primary source of inspiration. Second most important to me is the production designer. The DP and designer can make or break each other. The communication and cooperation is essential. Decisions involving choosing locations, set construction, wall colors and furnishings all make a huge difference in the look of the photography. There are many other collaborators that are important, as well.

It's important to respect the producer and production manager as collaborators. If you show them that you are responsible with the budget, and careful to not waste their money, I've found you can get their support when you really need it, even for something that may be considered elaborate or a luxury. I also have longtime collaborators on my crew that I consider essential keys to my success. My gaffer, Cory Geryak, has worked on eight films with me and is not only a joy to work with, but is a great leader with a terrific eye for light. We have a great shorthand when we work, and I can trust him to get the lighting started on a set in exactly the way I want it.

Another longtime collaborator is my first assistant, Bob Hall. Bob is not only among the best and most highly regarded focus-pullers in Hollywood, but also a great leader and fantastic manager of the camera department. More recently I have worked with great camera operators like Scott Sakamoto (Road to Perdition) and Mitch Dubin (Saving Private Ryan), who both bring extraordinary talent, vision and skill to their work.

MM: Many of the moviemakers who worked on Memento, including writer/director Christopher Nolan and editor Dody Dorn, consider that film a turning point in their careers. Would you agree?

WP: No question about it. Memento was a turning point for all involved. How could it not be? It was such a small picture that had such a huge impact on audiences. It really proved that audiences had been craving something highly original at a time when the studios were pumping out one sequel after another.

I had been a director of photography for 10 years by the time Memento was released. Many years were spent struggling to be noticed and to get beyond the lower budget films. Memento and, more importantly, Chris Nolan, changed all that. However, I don't know if I would have been as successful if all this had happened, say, eight or nine years ago. Part of what helped make this a successful turning point was the fact that my work and attitude had matured in that time period. I was a much better filmmaker and person by the time I met Chris than I was in the early years of my career. I'm now in a very different world than I was just three years ago. I recently finished a $90 million movie (The Italian Job), I'm a member of the ASC and, for the first time in my career, I am able to choose the projects that I want to shoot. I feel very fortunate to be in this position, but it did not happen overnight!

MM: Light and color are a very important part of your work. How do you use these tools to further your job as storyteller? What are the other aspects of moviemaking that you deem most important to complement the cinematography?

WP: Light and color are two primary ingredients. The color of both the light and the sets can trigger emotions and help push the audience in the direction that the director wants to send them. Warmer colors are generally more inviting and comforting, and the cooler (more blue) tones tend to have the opposite effect. But it's important to note that these are not steadfast rules-none are in filmmaking. If you try to adhere to a specific set of rules in your work, then you are not working hard enough to interpret that narrative on its own merit. It's important to always challenge yourself; to take an original approach to the material whenever possible.

In addition to light and color, the other key ingredients are composition, camera placement, camera movement and focal length. My years as a camera operator, primarily for Phedon Papamichael, ASC, taught me invaluable lessons in these areas. The camera placement and its relation to the actors is a key ingredient that is commonly overlooked. It can put the audience right in there with the actors-or remove them, whichever is desired. Chris Nolan puts a lot of emphasis on this. It shows his care in use of the camera as a storytelling component.

MM: How did you become involved with Laurel Canyon?

WP: After finishing Insomnia, I wanted to be very careful about what I did next. I turned down several large budget pictures, and vowed to not taint the success of Memento and Insomnia with material that I might consider doing just for the money. I had seen Lisa Cholodenko's first film, High Art, and found it to be fantastic character study. I found the same kind of charm in the script for Laurel Canyon and after a great meeting with Lisa, signed on to do the picture.

From the outset, Lisa and I had a common language that we wanted to use in the storytelling of this film. It was based in part on films of the late '60s and early '70s, by great filmmakers like Mike Nichols, Hal Ashby and Robert Altman. Not so much in the look of the films, but more in the tone and spirit of the storytelling.

MM: Does having two very distinct sides to a story-like the personalities of Frances McDormand and Christian Bale in Laurel Canyon-make it easier for you to approach the photography of a film (i.e. different colors or lighting for each character), or do you prefer to differentiate the characters in a less obvious way? What was the biggest challenge you found on Laurel Canyon?

WP: While you can distinguish between specific characters with use of photography, either through colors, focal lengths or camera movement, we chose more to distinguish between physical environments, and to have visual elements, specifically camera movement, change as the story progresses.

The house that Frances McDormand's character lives in is a warmer environment with oranges, yellows and reds, while the hospital where Christian Bale's character works is cooler, more sterile, greens and blues. Clearly, the environments themselves end up defining the characters.

MM: What are you working on now?

WP: I've just completed shooting The Italian Job for Paramount. It's a remake of a 1969 picture starring Michael Caine. This is a big action movie starring Mark Wahlberg, Charlize Theron, Edward Norton and Donald Sutherland that features a huge boat chase in Venice, Italy and an elaborate car chase around Los Angeles. It's quite a departure from my previous films, but an opportunity to do a big summer action movie, and have a little fun.


SHARE THIS STORY

Del.icio.us this itemDel.icio.us

Reddit this itemReddit

Yahoo this item Yahoo

TAGS

COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT

POST A COMMENT

OUR PRIVACY POLICY | We will not publish or sell or share your email address or other personal information. Read more.

Name:  
Email:  
URL:  

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

Blog/Forum/Poll navigation

Blog Forums Polls

Latest from the blog:

In Theaters Now: Hancock & The Wackness

This July 4th weekend box office demonstrates what America is all about: Big superheros and movie stars battling it out against a potential independent gem.

Posted 07.4.08 | In Theaters Now | No comments yet...

Other recent posts:

Posts people are talking about:

Blog

SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS