Cinema Law: What's In a Title?

by Jeremiah Reynolds | Published May 25, 2009

Welcome to “Cinema Law,” MovieMaker.com’s all-new blog where you ask the questions of our resident team of legal experts and, each week, they’ll provide the answers to your production queries. Have a burning question yourself? E-mail it to and your question may just be on next week’s blog! Cinema Law is presented as general information only and is not meant to take the place of professional legal advice.

Q: I made a short film in 1983 and now a feature film is being made with the same title. The storylines are not the same but nobody checked with me about using my title. What options do I have? To whom would I file a complaint? Would it be with the studio making the film? The director? Or the screenwriter? Do I even have a case for suit?

A: A title can make a major difference in the success or failure of motion picture, and it certainly makes sense that you would attempt to seek legal protection for your movie title. Surprisingly, such protection can often be difficult to obtain, as movie titles cannot be copyrighted. Thus, a film owner must look to trademark law as the source of legal protection for his or her movie title, but obtaining such protection is not automatic.

In general, a person can seek to register a trademark with the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). Once a registration is obtained from the PTO, the trademark is presumed to be valid and the registrant is presumed to be the exclusive owner of the trademark. But the PTO will not register a single movie title as a trademark. To obtain a registration from the PTO, there must be at least one sequel for the movie to qualify as a series. In your case, you cannot obtain a registration from the PTO for your movie title since you’ve only made a single short film.

Courts have not been as rigid in their treatment of legal protection for movie titles. Courts have said that a movie title can qualify for trademark protection if the owner can prove that the title has obtained “secondary meaning.” To prove that a movie title has secondary meaning, an owner would need to show that, in the minds of the public, the movie title has become associated with a single source. In your case, this would mean that you would have to prove that the public associates the title of your movie with you. If your movie was a short film in 1983 that was not a major success, this would be nearly impossible to prove. Thus, the bad news is that it is highly unlikely that you have a case for a lawsuit.

Jeremiah Reynolds is an associate at Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert, a high-profile, L.A.-based entertainment litigation firm, and specializes in complex business litigation, particularly upon entertainment related litigation and contractual disputes. Reynolds’ experience includes disputes relating to motion picture and television distribution rights, merchandising and licensing rights, profit participation and other accounting issues, contractual disputes and intellectual property disputes. In 2006 and 2007, Reynolds was named a “2006 and 2007 Southern California Rising Star” by the publishers of Los Angeles Magazine. He is a cum laude graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles (B.A., 1997) and received his J.D. from the University of Southern California in 2002.

The answers to legal questions provided by the lawyers of Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump & Aldisert, LLP ("KWIKA") are for general education and information purposes only, and are not legal advice or legal opinions. The information provided in the articles is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship between KWIKA and you. The opinions expressed in the postings are the opinions of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of KWIKA, its employees or agents.

COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT

Comment by aziz man on 6/03/09 at 9:03 pm

i am writing to you from saudi arabia, can i copyright my treatment or screenplay in the usa , how and where ?

Comment by famous wonders on 6/30/09 at 11:22 am

I didn’t know that a movie title couldn’t be copyrighted. I thought that every part of the movie was to be under a copyright

Comment by serenalin on 8/11/09 at 3:19 am

thank you Link Text

Comment by Stillbirth on 8/14/09 at 9:20 am

Yeah, I heard about this a year ago that movie titles are subject to copyright, but I just wonder if this copyrighting is only valid for a certain country or in the other counties as well.

Comment by Wedding Butterfly on 8/14/09 at 11:29 am

Thanks for the post. I have a question. I know this is about movies and everything but what about in the music industry. I have a band with a major label then we found out that there’s another band with the same name as ours, and we know for a fact we were first! Can we do something about it, legally? I just thought I’d try asking, or can you at least point me to the right direction. Thank you.

Comment by Freelance projects on 9/19/09 at 5:15 am

Hello !

Thanks for the postings.In this movie projects Is there any freelance is available.Can any one give me a good idea..

Nice article!Keep up the good work..

Comment by shoppingtiffany on 10/24/09 at 12:02 am

very nice shoppingtiffany

Comment by Dicas Budapeste on 11/06/09 at 3:39 pm

It seems very difficult to copyright a movie title indeed. I have done my research, and making a sequel and registering a trademark with the Patent and Trademark Office seems to be the only valid way of getting this through.

POST A COMMENT

OUR PRIVACY POLICY | We will not publish or sell or share your email address or other personal information. Read more.

Name:
Email:
URL:

Type the word you see below:

Comment:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS

Home | Latest Headlines
Screenwriting | Producing | Directing | Acting | Cinematography | Editing | Distribution | Education | Festivals | Locations
Listings | Archives | HOP Interviews | Blogs | Forums | Contests | Subscriptions | Advertising

About | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Contact

© 2010 MovieMaker Magazine

Web site design by Hop Studios