Advertisement
Shakespeare on Film: Romeo and Juliet
With Romeo and Juliet, Franco Zeffirelli interprets the language of young love in MM's fifth week of Shakespeare on Film.
Romeo and Juliet (1968)
directed by Franco Zeffirelli
Franco Zeffirelli sowed the seeds of this box office triumph in 1960, when the Italian director-designer made his Shakespeare stage debut with Romeo and Juliet at London’s Old Vic. In 1967, he set out to replicate that Old Vic passion on film, immediately after his success with The Taming of the Shrew. He was confident of attracting a large international audience and, believing that “the kids in the story are like teenagers today,” took a gamble by casting actors almost as young as their characters: Leonard Whiting was 17, Olivia Hussey, chosen ahead of 350 other hopefuls, just 15.
Emulating Renato Castellani’s 1954 precedent, Zeffirelli spent much of the three-month shoot at Italian locations: Small towns in Tuscany and Umbria, with some interiors recreated at Cinecittà Studios in Rome. Shakespeare’s action unfolds in medieval churches, sun-drenched piazzas and shady side streets filled with handsome, athletic boys in color-coded tights and codpieces (garish red and yellow for Capulets, discreet blue for Montagues).
From the opening, frenzied brawl to the final procession of Capulet and Montague mourners, the whole film, as Richard Burton said to Zeffirelli after seeing some early footage, “looks sensational.” Yet Burton also cautioned: “You’ve got problems with the verse,” and Whiting and Hussey were the chief culprits.
Their youth makes the lovers’ infatuation more credible than in George Cukor; their beauty is beyond question (the nudity in the wedding night scene caused a minor stir), and every intimate moment is underscored by Nino Rota’s soaring love theme (later to become a hit record). Yet their struggle to convey the meaning of the language is painful to behold, even though Zeffirelli had cut more than half the text. Hussey fares marginally better of the two, her face conveying memorable dread as the story spirals towards her suicide. Whiting’s London-accented Romeo remains more love-struck wimp than desperate, fate-driven hero, an impression reinforced because Zeffirelli (unlike Cukor and Castellani) does not jeopardize audience sympathy by showing Romeo killing Paris.
The film opened to mixed reviews in the U.K. and the U.S.: The New Statesman felt Zeffirelli “might just as well have jettisoned the Bard altogether”; Time hailed “one of the handful of classic Shakespeare films.” The visual splendor brought Academy Awards for cinematographer Pasqualino De Santis and costume designer Danilo Donati, with unsuccessful nominations for Best Picture and Best Director (Oliver! won both). At box offices Zeffirelli’s casting gamble and populist instincts paid off spectacularly; a worldwide gross of $48 million made this the biggest Shakespeare hit of all time.
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Del.icio.us
Reddit
YahooAdvertisement
COMMENTS | POST A COMMENT 
- Comment by Merewyn on 8/31/08 at 6:43 pm
Whiting and Hussey really didn’t “struggle” with the meaning of the language. They spoke it as real teenagers would—which is exactly what Romeo and Juliet were supposed to be!
Latest from the blog:
In Theaters Now: Body of Lies, City of Ember, Quarantine, Happy-Go-Lucky & RocknRolla
Russell Crowe and Ridley Scott take Leonardo DiCaprio along for the ride on their gravy train while Bill Murray and Guy Ritchie aim for comebacks after Garfield and Swept Away, respectively.
Posted 10.10.08 | In Theaters Now | No comments yet...
Other recent posts:
indieProducer’s 6th Annual Screenwriting Competition & Short Film Contest
Penélope Cruz To Receive Tribute at Gotham Awards
Create Your Own SAW V Trailer and Win Big
Posts people are talking about:
SITE DELIVERY OPTIONS
